Roll your own
Weblogs & zines
Eschaton by Atrios
Ethel the Blog
kill your tv dot com
Pigs & Fishes
Silt by vaara
T. C. MITS
This Modern World
Truth Laid Bear
Someday the game of chess will become obsolete. The number of unique games that can possibly be played is very large, with estimates starting around 1040 and ranging through 10120 and beyond (for comparison, there are only 1080 protons in the whole universe). That keeps the game interesting, for now.
However, chess is fully deterministic and so with sufficient computing power it will eventually be possible to traverse all possible games and to compute the outcome of the perfectly-played game of chess. It may be that that black invariably wins, or the advantage may be with white, but once the map of all possible moves and counter-moves is known then we will know which of the two is the guaranteed winner of any well-played game (unless the inevitable outcome is a draw). In any case, once the outcome is predictable, the game of chess will become pointless.
Pointlessness is also the defining characteristic of the brutal and tragic game now being played in the Middle East. Everybody knows what the ultimate resolution will be - a compromise involving two states, divided along the pre-1967 borders with some adjustments, Palestine mostly de-militarized, the settlements mostly removed, some partitioning or sharing of Jerusalem, payments in lieu of right of return for most displaced Palestinians, etc. etc. etc.
Everybody knows this, but the carnage continues.
This is ridiculous. This is not a game played for advantage, it's a series of mindless conditioned reflexes - hit me, hit you. Neither side can afford to show weakness. Neither side can stop retaliating. And neither side can win.
Everybody knows the end game, but no-one knows how to get there.
Maybe the cycle of violence is more than just a cliché. Maybe the repeating sequence of retaliation and revenge is really the underlying dynamic, eclipsing reason. Whether or not that's the case, it seems pretty clear that the leaderships of both sides as presently constituted cannot find the way to a settlement.
Everybody knows the solution, so why is the problem not being solved?
The lunatics are running the asylum.
The French Justice Ministry sent a letter to Mr. Ashcroft this week, officials in Washington said, pointing out that an agreement between the two governments allowed France to end cooperation in a case in which a French citizen faced execution in the United States.And it's not just the prosecutors who would be dealt a serious blow, per Reuters:
French Justice Minister Marylise Lebranchu has said France, which abolished capital punishment in 1981, would not accept the death penalty for Moussaoui and that it might not cooperate with the September 11 investigation.In other words, the U.S. may have to give up valuable intelligence information if it insists on subjecting Zacarias Moussaoui to the death sentence. Apparently, the Dept. of Justice places a higher value on revenge killing than on obtaining intelligence that could potentially save innocent lives.
Following my instructions, the United States attorneys have filed a notice of intent to seek a sentence of death. In the notice we have alleged numerous reasons, called aggravating factors, which we believe indicate why the death penalty is appropriate. Among these reasons is the impact of the crime on thousands of victims. To that end, we remain committed not only to carrying out justice in this case but also to ensuring that the rights of the victims are fully protected.If this is justice as distinct from revenge, why does "the impact of the crime on thousands of victims" matter? A bad act is a bad act regardless of consequences, and justice for a given bad act should not depend on incidental factors such as the eloquence of the survivors. And the victims surely have a right to be made whole when possible, but Mr. Ashcroft is not talking about suing Mr. Moussaoui for damages. He's talking about giving the victims the satisfaction of knowing that maximal harm has been inflicted on Mr. Moussaoui, and he thinks that this is a good thing.
Maybe it's a good thing or maybe not, but it's a thing that's indistinguishable from revenge. By equating justice with revenge, and by indulging the essentially atavistic urge to kill, Mr. Ashcroft manages to at once diminish the difference between us and our opponents, and forgo significant intelligence information. And that's not a good thing.
But what about sovereignty? Well, that is a problem now. We certainly don't want to show weakness by accommodating the feelings of our NATO ally France (as opposed to the gentle way we treat, say, our really good friends Saudi Arabia and Pakistan). But it's only a problem because Attorney General Ashcroft, knowing the French position full well in advance, decided nonetheless to put on a capital case. Given the circumstances of the case -- Mr. Moussaoui was in jail at the time of the crime - Mr. Ashcroft could easily have chosen a different penalty. But he didn't, and here we are.
ARCHIVE July 8th - July 14th, 2002 July 1st - July 7th, 2002 June 24th - June 30th, 2002 June 3rd - June 9th, 2002 May 20th - May 26th, 2002 May 13th - May 19th, 2002 May 6th - May 12th, 2002 April 22nd - April 28th, 2002 April 1st - April 7th, 2002 March 25th - March 31st, 2002 March 18th - March 24th, 2002 March 11th - March 17th, 2002 March 4th - March 10th, 2002 February 25th - March 3rd, 2002 February 18th - February 24th, 2002 February 4th - February 10th, 2002 January 28th - February 3rd, 2002 January 21th - January 27th, 2002 January 6th - January 13th, 2002 December 10th - December 16th, 2001 December 3rd - December 9th, 2001 November 26th - December 2nd, 2001 November 19th - November 25th, 2001 November 11th - November 18th, 2001 November 4th - November 10th, 2001 October 11th - November 3rd, 2001
|The floggings will cease when morale improves.|