Roll your own
Weblogs & zines
Eschaton by Atrios
Ethel the Blog
kill your tv dot com
Pigs & Fishes
Silt by vaara
T. C. MITS
This Modern World
Truth Laid Bear
Dept. of Bizarre Coincidence: the domain name saudi-binladin-group.com was registered on October 27 to Chris Curry of Studio City, CA. According to a Howard Altman article in Wired News, Mr. Curry is a Web site designer who had originally purchased the domain name for resale. He subsequently decided to use the domain name for a site to distribute information about the bin Laden family. The still-incomplete site has been receiving 13,000 hits per day.
Previously the domain name had belonged to the Saudi Binladin Group, the bin Laden family conglomerate. The bin Ladin family has officially denounced Osama bin Laden.
Frozen snapshots of the Web site from when it was owned by the Saudi Binladin Group are available on the Internet Archive WayBack Machine.
What makes this story remarkable is the date on which the Saudi Binladin Group annual registration of the domain name expired: September 11th, 2001. The registration was not renewed and so the domain name became available to be registered by Mr. Curry.
This tends to indicate that the Saudi Binladin Group site at was only supposed to exist for one year, from September 11, 2000 to September 11th, 2001. As every Webmaster knows, you had better renew your annual domain name registration well before it expires or you can suffer consequences ranging from disruption of access to having someone else register the name immediately once it expires. The decision to not to renew the registration was probably made before, not after, September 11th.
There is no reason to suspect anything more than a coincidence here, but this sure is an odd one.
It's the death penalty, stupid. Responding to a reporter's questions about the extradition of terrorist suspects from Spain during a White House Photo-Op on Monday, George W. Bush said that he was "not the least bit concerned" that U.S. allies are balking at administration plans to prosecute suspected terrorists before military tribunals. "It is the right decision to make and I will explain that to any leader who asks", said Mr. Bush.
Mr. Bush does have some explaining to do, but not necessarily about military tribunals. This according to Spanish Prime Minister Jose Mariz Aznar, who visited the NY Stock Exchange this morning and paused for a live interview with a CNBC reporter. The reporter asked about the extradition to the U.S. of eleven suspects arrested in Spain, for whom there was evidence of direct links to Osama Bin Laden.
Prime Minister Aznar replied that should the U.S. request the extradition of these suspects, the request would be honored in compliance with Spanish law. He said that military tribunals per se would not be a reason for the denial of an extradition request, but that the suspects would not be extradited if they were subject to the death penalty.
So according to the Prime Minister, it's not the military tribunals but rather the possible imposition of a death sentence that might prohibit our allies, properly, from extraditing terrorism suspects to the U.S. No civilized country utilizes judicial killing as a mechanism of social control. Perhaps it's time for the United States to join the ranks of civilized nations, if only for reasons of expediency.
The World War II military tribunal prosecuted American citizens, according to a U.S. Coast Guard article about Operation Pastorious, the Nazi sabotage attempt. Here is how it describes the recruitment of the eight men who would later be prosecuted by a secret military tribunal:
Two naturalized citizens and six Germans who had lived in America for varying lengths of time were chosen to undertake a crash course in sabotage.Mr. Bush's military order establishing the institution that William Safire too-kindly called a "Star Chamber" is limited to "any individual who is not a United States citizen". But what if an American citizen is suspected of involvement in terrorist activity?
The stated argument in support of Bush's edict is that secret military tribunals are necessary to protect against retaliation and the exposure of U.S. intelligence. If that is the case, then there is no logical reason why citizens suspected of terrorist activity should be treated differently from non-citizens facing similar suspicions.
That is why it's significant that the World War II military tribunal cited most often as a precedent for Bush's order apparently prosecuted American citizens. There may be another shoe yet to drop.
Finally, why did I call Safire's "Star Chamber" reference too kind? Because the original Star Chamber was at least a somewhat civilized institution, in that it was not able to impose a death penalty. Bush's secret military tribunal is under no such constraint, and it deserves Safire's more accurate epithet, kangaroo court.
MR. RUSSERT: Franklin Roosevelt in World War II apprehended eight Nazi...
This History Net article essentially confirms Sen. Lehey's description.
Rather than being an argument for military tribunals, this WWII precedent seems to caution against them.
ARCHIVE July 8th - July 14th, 2002 July 1st - July 7th, 2002 June 24th - June 30th, 2002 June 3rd - June 9th, 2002 May 20th - May 26th, 2002 May 13th - May 19th, 2002 May 6th - May 12th, 2002 April 22nd - April 28th, 2002 April 1st - April 7th, 2002 March 25th - March 31st, 2002 March 18th - March 24th, 2002 March 11th - March 17th, 2002 March 4th - March 10th, 2002 February 25th - March 3rd, 2002 February 18th - February 24th, 2002 February 4th - February 10th, 2002 January 28th - February 3rd, 2002 January 21th - January 27th, 2002 January 6th - January 13th, 2002 December 10th - December 16th, 2001 December 3rd - December 9th, 2001 November 26th - December 2nd, 2001 November 19th - November 25th, 2001 November 11th - November 18th, 2001 November 4th - November 10th, 2001 October 11th - November 3rd, 2001
|The floggings will cease when morale improves.|