Roll your own
Weblogs & zines
Eschaton by Atrios
Ethel the Blog
kill your tv dot com
Pigs & Fishes
Silt by vaara
T. C. MITS
This Modern World
Truth Laid Bear
There's nothing wrong with that. Enron was playing by the rules, and the rules say it's OK to contribute to politicians who best represent your interests. In fact, it's possible that government-dependant companies like Halliburton and Carlyle are remiss in their fiduciary duties if they don't run computer simulations of various what-if scenarios for military spending and energy policy, in order to maximize return on their investment in politicians.
Gia Maisashvili, an economist who had worked on the Enron computer model, ultimately quit in disgust at the way it was used. He told the Post:
They could have cared less if that was a good thing [for the public] or not. They cared only if this was good for Enron.Mr. Maisashvili may have let his conscience guide him, but we can't expect corporations to have a conscience. Corporations exist in order to maximize profits for investors, and they shouldn't be expected to elevate some concept of the public good above profit. They shouldn't even be expected to discern what the public good is, other than to obey the rule of law.
It's up to government to decide what is in the interest of the public and the country, not corporate CEOs. Capitalism works, but it only works to the benefit of all in the context of sufficient government regulation and oversight. The fiduciary responsibility of corporate management is to maximize shareholder value; attendance to the public good is the duty of government.
More from the Post (via JMM):
"The ingrained philosophy was, me first, money counts and the government should eliminate my taxes," said another former manager. "That's all they cared about -- what impacted them personally."
The administration recently produced a budget document featuring a drawing of Gulliver tied down by Lilliputians. The analogy, presumably, is to the constraints imposed by on business by elected politicians.
Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill had this to say on the issue:
I've dedicated my life to doing what I can to get rid of rules that limit human potential, and I'm not going to stop.Don't have your secret decoder ring handy? No problem. To understand what he really meant, just substitute "corporate" for "human" in that quote. And that should answer the question of whether this administration can be trusted to look after the public weal.
ARCHIVE July 8th - July 14th, 2002 July 1st - July 7th, 2002 June 24th - June 30th, 2002 June 3rd - June 9th, 2002 May 20th - May 26th, 2002 May 13th - May 19th, 2002 May 6th - May 12th, 2002 April 22nd - April 28th, 2002 April 1st - April 7th, 2002 March 25th - March 31st, 2002 March 18th - March 24th, 2002 March 11th - March 17th, 2002 March 4th - March 10th, 2002 February 25th - March 3rd, 2002 February 18th - February 24th, 2002 February 4th - February 10th, 2002 January 28th - February 3rd, 2002 January 21th - January 27th, 2002 January 6th - January 13th, 2002 December 10th - December 16th, 2001 December 3rd - December 9th, 2001 November 26th - December 2nd, 2001 November 19th - November 25th, 2001 November 11th - November 18th, 2001 November 4th - November 10th, 2001 October 11th - November 3rd, 2001
|The floggings will cease when morale improves.|